THE ORIGINS OF THE INTERPRETATION AND THE PROBLEM OF DIFFERENT INTERPRETERS IN THE INTERPRETATION (SECTARIAN FANATICISM AS EXEMPLARY)

Abstract

The study aimed to know the origins of interpretation, explain its methods and contemporary status, then explain the reasons for the difference and sectarian fanaticism among interpreters in interpretation, show some examples of this difference, and the effects that sectarian fanaticism produces, then find a treatment, results, then the conclusion of the research and recommendations. The research used the inductive approach, based on analyzing what jurists said in interpreting Quranic verses related to sectarian rulings. The research concluded that the principles of interpretation and its methods are a broad science, with acceptable conditions and controls in interpretation, and that the jurisprudential disagreement between jurisprudence is praiseworthy and merciful, as it is like a medical tree with fixed origins, many branches and extended. As for jurisprudential disagreement, it produces conflict, hatred, and dispersion. The research recommended not leaving Education and jurisprudence are a void in fanatical ignorance. He also recommended supporting sectarian circles and academies, scientific symposiums, a body of working scholars, Islamic colleges, institutes and universities that aim to encourage Islamic studies and research on addressing sectarian difference.