DOCTRINE OF HOT PURSUIT UNDER MARITIME LAW: AN ANALYSIS OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK
Abstract
The doctrine of hot pursuit under maritime law is a key legal mechanism employed by States to combat transnational crimes at sea, such as piracy, drug trafficking, and illegal fishing. This research article provides a comprehensive analysis of the international legal framework surrounding the doctrine of hot pursuit. By examining the origins, evolution, and principles of hot pursuit, as well as its relationship with State sovereignty, the study aims to shed light on the justifications and challenges associated with this doctrine. The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and other international agreements pertaining to hot chase are examined, along with the customary international law concepts that underpin hot pursuit. Variations and harmonization efforts across various marine zones are highlighted as regional approaches to hot pursuit are also taken into consideration.
Additionally, this research examines the interplay between hot pursuit and human rights law, considering potential implications and challenges that arise in this context. It explores the impact of hot pursuit on law enforcement agencies and naval forces, considering the complexities associated with coordination and cooperation among states. Lastly, this study offers recommendations and potential reforms for enhancing the effectiveness of the doctrine of hot pursuit in combating maritime crimes. It identifies areas for further research and concludes with a reflection on the contribution of this analysis to the development of maritime law.
Overall, it also provides a comprehensive analysis of the international legal framework surrounding the doctrine of hot pursuit, shedding light on its varied principles, challenges, and practical implications. It serves as a valuable resource for legal practitioners, policymakers, and scholars interested in understanding and improving the implementation of hot pursuit in the maritime domain.
